Selling a property is a process that requires thought, strategy, and often patience. One of the key questions most homeowners ask themselves is: should I entrust the sale of my property to several agencies or opt for a single agency on an exclusive basis? This choice can directly impact the speed of the sale, the price obtained, and the level of investment required from the agencies. In this article, we will examine the advantages and disadvantages of both options and provide practical advice to help you make the best choice based on your situation and your property.
1. Exclusive mandate: a single agency dedicated to the sale
What is an exclusive mandate?
An exclusive mandate means that the owner entrusts the sale of their property to a single real estate agency for a fixed period, usually between three and six months. During this period, no other agency can be involved in the sale of the property, and the owner cannot sell the property themselves, under penalty of having to pay fees to the agency.
Advantages of an exclusive mandate
1.1. Total commitment of the agency
With an exclusive mandate, the real estate agency is more motivated to sell the property quickly, knowing it's the only one that can close the deal and earn a commission. This often encourages the agency to implement a more aggressive marketing strategy and use additional resources to attract potential buyers. This can include services such as professional photography, virtual tours, online advertising, and extensive exposure on real estate portals.
1.2. Simplification of exchanges
An exclusive mandate simplifies management for the owner, as they only have one point of contact. There is no risk of conflict or poor coordination between multiple agencies, which can prevent some of the common confusions associated with non-exclusive mandates (multiple mandates).
1.3. Impression of exclusivity for buyers
Properties sold under an exclusive mandate can create a sense of scarcity among potential buyers, who may feel they have access to an exclusive opportunity. This can sometimes encourage buyers to make a quicker decision, fearing they might miss out on a good deal.
1.4. Facilitated Negotiation
Having a single point of contact can streamline negotiations. The agency can best represent your interests by having a comprehensive overview of the offers received, without being in direct competition with other agencies. This can also prevent overbidding or underpricing, as prices will be consistent and aligned.
Disadvantages of an exclusive mandate
1.5. Dependence on a single agency
If the agency doesn't demonstrate sufficient commitment, or if it lacks access to a large network of buyers, the owner can waste valuable time. It is therefore essential to choose an agency with a good reputation and proven expertise in selling properties similar to yours.
1.6. Risk of inactivity
Some owners complain that, despite an exclusive mandate, certain agencies become inactive after a few weeks if they don't receive offers quickly. It's important to set clear expectations before signing the mandate and to request regular reports on viewings and actions taken to sell the property.
2. Simple mandate: multiply the agencies to maximize visibility
What is a simple mandate?
A non-exclusive mandate allows the owner to entrust the sale of their property to several agencies simultaneously. They can also sell their property independently, without paying agency commissions, if a buyer is found directly. This is a more flexible option for owners who want to reach the widest possible pool of potential buyers.
Advantages of a simple mandate
2.1. Increased visibility
The main advantage of a non-exclusive listing agreement is maximum exposure for the property. By being listed with multiple agencies and on several real estate portals, your property reaches a much wider audience. This can be particularly useful in highly competitive markets or in areas where supply exceeds demand.
2.2. Competition between agencies
With a non-exclusive listing agreement, agencies compete to sell the property first and earn the commission. This dynamic can encourage some agencies to work harder to find buyers quickly. This competition can ultimately benefit the property owner.
2.3. Flexibility for the owner
With a non-exclusive mandate, the owner can manage the sale as they see fit. If one agency doesn't seem to be performing well, they can rely on others. Furthermore, the owner always has the option of selling their property themselves, which can save on agency fees.
Disadvantages of a simple mandate
2.4. Less commitment from agencies
When multiple agencies have access to a property, none of them has exclusive rights to the sale. This can lead to a lower investment in advertising and marketing. An agency might be reluctant to spend too many resources, knowing it has no guarantee of receiving a commission.
2.5. Risk of confusion for buyers
A property listed by multiple agencies may appear several times on the same real estate portals, sometimes with different information (price, description, photos). This can damage the property's image and give buyers the impression that the seller is desperate to sell, or worse, that the property has problems.
2.6. Coordination problems
Non-exclusive agencies may sometimes be less well-coordinated, particularly regarding viewings, buyer feedback, or negotiations. This can create confusing situations for the owner and make it difficult to manage multiple contacts simultaneously.
3. Which option should you choose depending on your situation?
The choice between an exclusive mandate and a simple mandate should be made according to several criteria, such as the nature of the property, its location, and your level of involvement in the sales process.
When is an exclusive mandate preferable?
3.1. Prestigious or atypical property
If you're selling a high-end or unique property (luxury villa, architect-designed house, property with exceptional views), it's often wiser to opt for an exclusive mandate. Rare properties require a carefully crafted and targeted marketing strategy, and a dedicated agency will be better positioned to offer a tailored service.
3.2. If you trust the agency
If you have found a real estate agency that has strong expertise in your geographical area or for properties similar to yours, an exclusive mandate can speed up the sale while minimizing hassles.
3.3. Fast and structured sales
If you want to sell quickly and avoid dealing with multiple agents, an exclusive mandate is ideal. It guarantees smoother communication and more precise monitoring of the actions taken by the agency.
When should you opt for a simple mandate?
3.4. Highly competitive area
In large cities or areas where many similar properties are for sale, it can be beneficial to use multiple agencies. This allows you to reach more potential buyers quickly, in a market that is often very competitive.
3.5. If you wish to maintain some flexibility
A simple mandate is best suited to owners who want to remain in control of the process, or who prefer to have the option of selling the property themselves.
3.6. To maximize visibility
In a slow or saturated real estate market, increasing your property's visibility by listing it with multiple agencies can improve your chances of selling. However, ensure that all agencies provide consistent information to avoid damaging the property's image.
4. Our practical tips for selling effectively
4.1. Compare the agencies
Take the time to meet with several real estate agencies before signing a mandate, whether it's a simple or exclusive one. Verify their expertise, their knowledge of the local market, and ask for examples of similar properties they have sold.
4.2. Negotiate the terms of the mandate
Before signing a mandate, whether exclusive or non-exclusive, discuss the terms. You can negotiate the contract duration, specific marketing activities, and include clauses for early termination in case of dissatisfaction.
4.3. Request regular reports
Demand regular reports from the agency detailing the actions taken and feedback obtained during site visits. This allows you to monitor the process and adjust your strategy as needed.
4.4. Check the consistency of the ads
If you opt for a simple mandate, ensure that the information and visuals of your property are consistent across all platforms where it is advertised, in order to avoid any confusion among buyers.
In conclusion, the choice between an exclusive or non-exclusive mandate depends primarily on your priorities, the nature of your property, and the local real estate market. Take the time to evaluate your options and choose an agency that can meet your expectations to ensure a successful sale.
Follow “ ProprietesDeCharme.com ” on YouTube but also on Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Instagram Pinterest
